Good handle on how many in fact they're. at their! and insect is something. with three body parts and usually six. legs! well if they've lost links they have. fewer than six. but usually six lakes. travail et étude
Study is extremely limited designed. moreover the mit authors confident. prediction that. unlimited exposure to radiation four. hundred times higher than normal would. be harmless. had already failed in a study using a. dose three times less. what is even more troubling is that not. only had their already been lab animal. research from which to predict. new killer accident genotoxicity but. there has also been research on. chromosomal aberrations in human beings. exposed to chernobyl disaster what. better model if humans in the nuclear. disaster zone could there be than humans. in a nuclear disaster zone to get a. sense of the extensive research into. genetic damage associated with the. chernobyl disaster. here's a google search on the terms. chernobyl chromosomal aberrations. noticed that we get an automatic link. on top just scholarly articles this. means these terms call open. unusually large amount a peer-reviewed. scholarly research. as we scroll down. we can see the returns are almost all to. science journals. reporting increased chromosomal. aberrations yet the mit study fails to. acknowledge the existence of any. pre-existing research on human genetic. damage associated with nuclear disasters. why should human research be excluded. when considering. has the mit authors explicitly do. abolishing current public protection.
travail et étude Faced difficulties in gaining the broad. social acceptance needed for success. reliance upon public education efforts. continues to be the main and largely. unsuccessful tactic to achieve. acceptance! this project will develop a model. for the social acceptability of nuclear. projects! end of quote so big brains at mit will. be dedicated to forging a sales pitch. for nuclear energy. so persuasive the public will swallow it. hook line and sinker. is this academia mit's pro-nuclear. activism is nothing new. for example in 2003. and mit report on the future of nuclear. energy! started how with the goal of the. threefold expansion of nuclear energy. capacity by 2050. the mit report recommended government. subsidies to achieve its nuclear growth. ambitions one reason many universities. actively promote the nuclear industry is. that they have nuclear engineering. departments. in contrast how many universities have. solar or wind engineering departments. so there's an inherent pro-nuclear bias. within academia the mit study should. also be considered in light of the fact. since the fukushima disaster a. disturbing fema nuclear advocacy has. been! not how can we prevent the next. fukushima! but how can we prevent evacuations. from the next fukushima the mit study.
No comments:
Post a Comment